In the world of networking, Cisco ASR and Juniper MX series routers are two of the biggest players. Both of these platforms offer excellent performance and capabilities, but there are some clear differences between the two. In this article, we will compare the two router platforms and discuss their strengths and weaknesses.
When it comes to performance, both Cisco ASR and Juniper MX have impressive specs. The ASR platform is designed for high-performance routing and provides up to 720Gbps of aggregate throughput. The MX series has an even higher throughput of up to 960Gbps. However, the ASR platform also offers more flexibility in terms of scalability, with modular systems that can be tailored for different applications.
In terms of features, the two platforms are fairly similar. Both include strong security, traffic management, and virtualization capabilities. The MX series also supports a wide range of open-source tools, while the ASR has more advanced features such as Quality of Service (QoS). Additionally, the MX platform is designed to integrate more seamlessly with third-party devices, while the ASR has better support for Cisco devices.
In terms of price, the Juniper MX series is generally more expensive than the Cisco ASR. However, when comparing features, it can be difficult to determine which one is the better investment.
Ultimately, it depends on the specific requirements of your network. Overall, both Cisco ASR and Juniper MX series routers offer excellent performance and features that make them suitable for a wide range of applications. The ASR platform is more scalable and offers more advanced features, while the MX series is more affordable and offers better integration with third-party devices. Ultimately, the decision between the two platforms should be based on the specific needs of your network.
Contact us today 866-HULANET or sales@hulanetworks.com
HULA HERALD 